Review Responsibilities

Once a proposal is locked and routed for review in GMAS, the Department, RAS (if required), and the Office for Sponsored Programs (OSP) will review the proposal with a set of distinct, but related, review criteria in mind:
 

Department Review (conducted by FAS Department/Center/Institute)
 

Department/Center/Institute signatures in GMAS indicate:

  • Approval of the PI as a member of the department in good standing and confirmation that the PI holds appropriate PI Rights within the department
  • Knowledge and approval of the subject area of the proposal
  • Approval of departmental resources (e.g. space and facilities, explicit or implied cost sharing, personnel) used by and/or committed to the project
  • Approval of PI and Senior Personnel effort commitments relative to their overall responsibilities and commitments to the department
  • Acceptance of responsibility for grant management and departmental oversight, if proposal is funded
  • Budgeted expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and consistently treated and in compliance with FAS, University, and sponsor policies
  • Proposal is complete and ready for RAS and/or OSP review

FAS School-level Review (conducted by RAS Dean/Designee Signatory)
 

It is RAS’ primary responsibility to:

  • Review budgets and budget justifications for:
    • Use of appropriate Indirect Cost rates (On-Campus or Off-Campus; Organized Research or Other Sponsored Activities)
    • Use of appropriate Fringe Benefits rates
    • Cost Sharing Commitments
    • Effort Commitments
    • Allowability, allocability, reasonableness, consistent treatment of costs
    • Adequate reflection of the proposed Scope of Work
  • Review individuals designated as Investigators and/or Key Personnel to confirm:
  • Appropriate PI Rights are in place or have been granted
  • Required Financial Conflict of Interest (COI) disclosures have been filed
  • Ensure that the following school-level concerns and policies are properly addressed:
    • Cost Sharing forms are completed and approved by the appropriate parties
    • Subawards/Subcontracts are properly budgeted
    • Dean or Divisional commitments (e.g. space or other forms of pledged support) are approved by the appropriate individuals
    • FAS/SEAS Policy on Assessments on Current Use Gifts and Sponsored Awards is properly applied in proposals submitted to non-federal sponsors

University-level Review (conducted by OSP Proposal Review Team)

In addition to reviewing for accuracy and compliance with sponsor guidelines and policy, proposal review by the Office for Sponsored Programs warrants that the legal and fiscal interests of the University are protected, and that detailed contract provisions involving intellectual property (e.g. patents and copyrights), restrictions on publication or other sharing of data or research results, external control over hiring practices, etc., conform with those considered acceptable by the University.

 

Unlike RAS, which limits their involvement to the review of the proposal and request types specifically outlined above, all proposals for external funding awarded to and administered by Harvard must be reviewed and approved by OSP.

 

It is OSP’s primary responsibility to:
 

  • Review proposals for compliance and accuracy with sponsor guidelines and requirements
  • Review proposals for compliance with University policies
  • Route proposals to the Provost Office for review if they meet any of the Provost Review Criteria
  • Review non-standard terms and conditions and, if necessary, liaise with other central offices (Office of Technology Development, Office of the General Council, etc.) to ensure the University can comply with award terms
  • Collaborate with Department and/or RAS to correct and revise proposals in response to concerns or errors identified
  • Update the GMAS Approvals module to reflect each project’s or person’s compliance with University and sponsor policies
  • Provide sponsor certifications and assurances (e.g. Representations and Certifications, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, Felony Convictions and Tax Delinquency)
  • Review accuracy and integrity of GMAS data to confirm that proposal details are properly captured
  • Review GMAS request for inclusion of RAS Dean/Designee Signatory on proposals meeting the RAS criteria as outlined above; add appropriate signatories when necessary


How does my proposal get submitted to the sponsor?

Once review is complete and the required Department and RAS signatures are recorded, OSP will:

  • Sign off on sponsor-required forms or approval letters as the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR), also known as an Authorized Signatory or Institutional Official
  • Provide signed Statements of Intent (SOI) or Letters of Intent (LOI) for subaward proposals
  • Submit final proposals to sponsors or confirm that submission will be handled by the department:
  • For proposals submitted through electronic application portals centrally managed by OSP, such as Grants.gov Workspace, NIH’s ASSIST, or NSF’s Fastlane or Research.gov, OSP will:
    • Communicate any system errors or warnings to the PI/Department 
    • Problem-solve any technical or systematic issues
    • Send submission confirmation e-mails or screenshots to PI/Department
  • For proposals submitted through electronic application portals not centrally managed by OSP and to which PIs can submit directly, OSP will :
    • Determine, in consultation with the department, whether OSP or the department will be responsible for submitting the proposal to the sponsor
After submission, OSP will:
  • Coordinate post-submission communications with the sponsor
  • Upload submission confirmation notifications to the GMAS document repository or confirm that the department has uploaded submission confirmation notifications
  • Lock final submitted version of proposal documents
  • Change proposal status in GMAS to Submitted to Sponsor