RAS Review Criteria

Temporary Changes to RAS Review Criteria, Effective May 8, 2023

updated May 5, 2023

The RAS Pre-Award team will team will follow these criteria, effective for proposals locked and routed as of May 8, 2023, until further notice. Major updates will be communicated broadly.

 

I. RAS Review and Approval Required (Indicated by “Dean/Designee Signatory” in GMAS)

Whether FAS is the responsible Tub or participates through Inter-Faculty Involvement (i.e., FAS faculty member or other researcher is not the lead Principal Investigator but may be assigned a part-of account for their portion of the project budget), RAS Pre-Award team must review and approve projects that contain the following:

For New and Competing Renewal Proposals

  1. Indirect Cost rate of less than 15%

2. Quantifiable Cost Sharing commitments (either mandatory or voluntary)

For Existing Projects

  1. Addition of new cost sharing commitments or specific changes to existing cost sharing commitments.

Dean/Designee Signatory:

 

II. RAS Notification Required (send email RAS to inform, but no GMAS sign-off required)

RAS Pre-Award team must be notified via email in the event of the following:

  • When exception to PI or Co-PI rights are needed, based on the FAS PI Eligibility Policy;
  • When plans for Indirect Cost shortfall recovery are modified after proposal submission or during award lifecycle;
  • When project involves international collaborations or activities from countries of concern (should also be identified in GMAS);
  • When an NSF proposal requires the inclusion of a Safe & Inclusive Work Environment Plan; and
  • When Provost review is required based on the University’s Provost Review Criteria.

RAS Notification Contacts:

 

III. RAS Review/Approval or Notification *Not* Required

Until further notice, new and competing renewal proposals meeting the below criteria will not require RAS Pre-Award team review, approval or notification unless they meet one or more of the criteria listed in sections I and/or II above:

  • Total project costs of $2 million or more;
  • Graduate and Postdoctoral Fellowships, even those that come with no Indirect Costs;
  • Federal Equipment and Instrumentation Grants (e.g. DoD DURIP, NIH SIG, or HEI grants);
  • Outgoing subawards/subcontracts included in Harvard’s proposed budget;
  • Multiple Harvard tubs/orgs are included in submission;
  • Institutional Training Grants (e.g., NIH T32s);
  • Grant-making grants; or
  • Incoming faculty grant transfers.

Until further notice, changes meeting the below criteria that are made during the life of an existing project will not require RAS Pre-Award team review, approval or notification unless they meet one or more of the criteria listed in sections I and/or II above,

  • Budget revisions of 25% or more from the originally proposed budget;
  • Supplemental funding requests;
  • Continuation requests (e.g., non-competing progress reports);
  • No-cost Extension requests;
  • New account requests;
  • Pre-Award cost requests that do not require sponsor prior approval;
  • Change Tub/Org requests;
  • At-Risk Account requests;
  • Change PI requests;
  • Outgoing PI transfers and early termination requests;
  • Addition of new subawards; or
  • Addition of new Interfaculty Involvement.

____________

Questions/Additional Contact information*:

____________

For additional information about review criteria and the responsibilities of each signing party, please see Review Responsibilities

For printer-friendly views of the current and the previous RAS review criteria, click the links below:

PDF of RAS Review Criteria in effect through 5-5-23

PDF of RAS Review Criteria in effect as of 10-1-18

PDF of RAS Review Criteria in effect through 9-30-18