Deadline: October 10, 2018 by 5:00PM
The Dean’s Competitive Fund for Promising Scholarship is a targeted program that provides funding in the following categories:
- Bridge funding, to allow faculty to continue work on previously funded research, scholarship, or creative activity that does not currently have external funding. Faculty who apply in this category should demonstrate that efforts have been made or will be made to obtain new external funding.
- Seed funding, to encourage faculty to launch exciting new scholarship or research directions that might not yet be ready to compete in traditional funding programs.
- Enabling subventions, to provide small funds to purchase (or upgrade) critical equipment. Applicants for such funds must have no existing startup funds on which they could draw for this purpose.
Please apply only if your funding needs fit into one of these categories. For all categories, applicants should clearly explain in non-specialist language the critical need, make a compelling case for large marginal gain, and justify the need for support from this fund rather than traditional sources. Project budgets of $5,000-$50,000 may be requested, though it should be noted that most funded awards will receive well below the award ceiling.
Requests for sabbatical top-ups will no longer be solicited through this funding mechanism. These requests may be made directly to the assistant dean of your division.
- This program is open to FAS and SEAS assistant, associate and tenured faculty; Professors in Residence and Professors of the Practice are also eligible.
- Faculty at other Harvard schools with no more than a zero FTE in the FAS/SEAS are not eligible for this program.
- Faculty may only submit one application per semester.
- Previous recipients may apply, though the committee is unlikely to provide continued funding for a project that has already received funding through this source.
- Current research balances for any applicant are considered and may influence the likelihood of funding.
Proposals will be read by a committee made up of faculty from the three FAS divisions and SEAS, so please ensure that your proposal makes sense to someone outside of your discipline. Applicants are asked to provide the following online here by October 10, 2018 by 5:00pm:
Information on any external funding you have applied for or intend to apply for to support the proposed project
If you received funding from this program in the past, you will be asked to describe how you used the funds.
1-3 sentence synopsis of the project (for public dissemination if awarded)
One paragraph explaining why this funding source is essential to the launch or success of the proposed project
Project description that is accessible to non-specialists (limit one page, PDF). Your proposal will be evaluated by reviewers from all three FAS divisions and SEAS, so it is critical that your proposal be accessible to those outside your field. The project description should include:
- The question or problem, and why it is important
- The approach to be taken
The potential impact of the proposed work.
Abridged CV or biosketch (limit two pages, PDF)
List of all current or pending external sources of grant support (PDF, include $ amounts)
- Budget and budget justification (limit one page, PDF, see samples). Budgets should provide enough information to convey the alignment of the costs with the proposed work. Proposals with insufficient budget justifications may see their budgets reduced. Faculty are encouraged to work closely with their grant administrators when including personnel and fringe. Faculty in Social Science Departments without a designated grant administrator may contact Amanda Ellenwood (firstname.lastname@example.org) and faculty in the Arts & Humanities Division may contact Jimmy Matejek (email@example.com) for support.
Examples of eligible expenses include but are not limited to:
- Personnel such as postdocs, graduate students, undergraduate students, consultants, translators. For any personnel from outside of Harvard, the budget justification should explain why the outside personnel were selected and CV(s) should be included in the supplementary documents.
- Fringe benefits
- Computer software that directly supports the proposed research
- Domestic and international travel
- Equipment user fees
- Archive fees
- Copyright acquisition
- Data acquisition costs, including human subjects payments
- Training to acquire a new skill or area of expertise that will enable the proposed project
The following expenses are NOT eligible for funding:
- Faculty salary
- Graduate student tuition
- Educational/course use
Optional: If you have a proposal that you have already submitted for competitive funding and you didn’t receive funding you may submit that original proposal and any external reviews you received, up to ten pages. Please note that proposals to the Dean’s Competitive Fund for Promising Scholarship will be reviewed by non-specialists and there is no guarantee that these supplementary documents will be reviewed.
The FAS dean appoints a small committee of eight faculty (two faculty members from each division and SEAS) that meets once per semester to review the submitted applications and make awards. The current committee membership is as follows:
- Daniel Carpenter (Chair), Allie S. Freed Professor of Government; Director of the Social Sciences at the Radcliffe Institute
- Jill Hooley, Professor of Psychology
- John Huth, Donner Professor of Science
- Ewa Lajer-Burcharth, William Dorr Boardman Professor of Fine Arts
- Scot Martin, Gordon McKay Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering and Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Daniel Needleman, Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics and Professor of Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Maryellen Ruvolo, Professor of Human Evolutionary Biology
- Susanna Siegel, Edgar Pierce Professor of Philosophy
With an annual budget of $2.5 million for the Dean’s Competitive Fund, the commitee will make awards to only the most promising of the applications and will stay within the budget of the funds. While there is no expectation that every application received will be funded, the committees will strive to award many small grants rather than a few large ones.